If you spend any time looking closely at the twigs of street trees or hedges, the surface of a weathered fence panel or even metal man-made objects, you will almost certainly encounter two of Milton Keynes’ most familiar lichens: Physcia adscendens and Physcia tenella. They are small, grey foliose lichens that thrive in the bright, nutrient enriched conditions typical of towns. Although easy to overlook at first, they quickly become recognisable companions once you learn their shapes and habits.
For full species description and glossary click on the PDF image or click here.
Distribution and Urban Habitats
Both species are widespread across Milton Keynes and can be found on a variety of substrates. They are particularly noticeable on hawthorn and weathered fence panels in Milton Keynes. But they happily also conquer the plastic, metal signs and concrete posts. No matter where you are in MK, you will spot them at every corner. Their success reflects their tolerance of mild nitrogen enrichment from traffic, fertilisers and bird activity.
Fig. 1. Physcia species growing on a twig, a rose hip and a sycamore seed. The rose hip and sycamore seed were photographed in Joe Clinch’s garden when he kindly opened it to the MKNHS members to see his flowering fritillaries. (Image credit: Jagoda Zajac, MKNHS)
Fig. 2. Physcia species growing on man‑made structures, including a plastic rope near the Cruck Barn, a metal gate – visible as the silver, speckled patches – and a wooden fence. (Image credit: Jagoda Zajac, MKNHS)
Key Identification Differences
The most important difference between the two species lies in the shape of their lobe tips (Fig. 3 and Fig. 4). Physcia adscendens is instantly recognisable once you learn to spot its distinctive hooded lobes. The tips of the lobes inflate into small-helmet-like hoods, where the soralia develop, which release the tiny reproductive propagules called soredia (Fig 5). These hoods give the species a slightly three-dimensional, pocketed appearance around the margins.
In contrast, Physcia tenella has lip-shaped lobe tips. Instead of forming hoods, the lobe ends turn back to create open, powdery soralia that look like tiny pale mouths. This difference—hoods versus lips—is the most reliable way to separate the two species in the field.
However, you may sometimes find specimens that clearly belong to the P. adscendens–P. tenella pair but still can’t be confidently placed in one species. This often happens when young thalli haven’t developed their distinctive soralia, or when the material is too poorly developed to interpret reliably.
Fig. 3. Comparison of Physcia adscendens and Physcia tenella, showing the contrasting lobe‑tip structures that distinguish the two species. (Image credit: Jagoda Zajac, MKNHS)
Fig. 4. Close‑up views of the lobe‑tip regions shown in Fig. 3, illustrating the hooded soralia of P. adscendens and the lip‑shaped soralia of P. tenella.(Image credit: Jagoda Zajac, MKNHS)
Fig. 5. Physcia adscendens showing the characteristic hooded lobe tips with soredia developing beneath the hoods. (Image credit: Jagoda Zajac, MKNHS)
Both Physcia adscendens and Physcia tenella are capable of producing apothecia (Fig.6) which are the disc‑like fruiting bodies that release sexual spores. In Physcia, they typically appear as black (P.adscendens) and dark brown (P.tenella) discs with a paler, slightly raised margin. P. tenella tends to produce apothecia more readily, sometimes quite abundantly in older thalli, whereas P. adscendens forms them less frequently. When present, apothecia add another layer of texture to the thallus and can be a useful feature for confirming identification.
Fig. 6. Comparison of the apothecia of Physcia adscendens and Physcia tenella, showing the differences in their colour, frequency and overall appearance. (Image credit: Jagoda Zajac, MKNHS)
Morphological Features
Morphologically, the two species share many features typical of the genus Physcia. They form small rosettes, usually between one and five centimetres across, with a grey upper surface. Both species have marginal cilia, the fine hair-like projections that fringe the lobe edges (Fig. 7). Their purpose is not entirely clear. Sometimes the cilia grow from one lobe and connect to another, helping to steady the lichen in the wind. This lets air move freely around the lobes which prevents them from becoming waterlogged.
Fig. 7. Physcia tenella showing the marginal cilia and the black pycnidia scattered on the lobes. (Image credit: Jagoda Zajac, MKNHS)
You may also notice tiny black dots on the lobe tips or margins: these are pycnidia, structures that produce asexual spores (Fig.7). The pale speckles scattered across the upper surface are maculae (Fig. 8). They occur where the algal layer is thinner or absent, allowing the pale fungal layer beneath to show through. Maculae often give Physcia species a speckled or frosted look and can be useful in identification. It is worth noting that some publications refer to these pale spots as pseudocyphellae but true pseudocyphellae are actual breaks in the cortex, forming pores or slits and are not present in Physcia.
Fig. 8. Physcia tenella showing the pale maculae clearly visible when the thallus is wet, with Xanthoria parietina on the right. Look closely for the marginal cilia. (Image credit: Jagoda Zajac, MKNHS)
Ecological Role and Air Quality
Beyond their identification, these lichens play a subtle but important role in the urban ecosystem. Their tolerance of nitrogen makes them useful indicators of air quality: their abundance suggests moderate enrichment, typical of towns but not extreme industrial pollution.
They also contribute directly to wildlife. Long-tailed tits, for example, collect fragments of Physcia and Xanthoria species to decorate the outside of their nests. The lichens adhere to the spider silk outer layer almost like Velcro, helping the nest blend perfectly with the surrounding twigs.
The Xanthorion Community
Both Physcia adscendens and P. tenella belong to the wider Xanthorion community, a group of lichens adapted to nutrient-rich, well-lit habitats. This assemblage includes genera such as Caloplaca (now often split into Flavoplaca and Athallia), Physcia, Physconia, Ramalina and Xanthoria. When you find one member of this group, you will often find several others nearby, forming a characteristic urban and suburban lichen flora shaped by light, nutrients and human influence.
Lichenicolous Fungi
Fig. 9. Physcia spp. with three lichenicolous fungi: A – Illosporiopsis christiansenii, forming pinkish patches; B – Laetisaria lichenicola, appearing as a reddish, web‑like film; C – Erythricium aurantiacum, showing its characteristic orange colouration.
Lichenicolous fungi add yet another layer of interest to these common Physcia species (Fig. 9). These are specialised fungi that live on or within lichens, often forming distinctive growths while relying on the lichen as their host. Three of the most frequently encountered lichenicolous fungi parasitising Physcia species are Illosporiopsis christiansenii, which forms soft pinkish patches on the thallus; Laetisaria lichenicola, a reddish, web‑like film that creeps across the surface; and the bright orange Erythricium aurantiacum, a striking but less common species. Lichens themselves support their own specialised communities, creating miniature ecosystems even on the smallest patch of bark or fence panel.
A Perfect Starting Point for Beginners
For beginners, these two Physcia species are ideal starting points. They are common, easy to observe without equipment, and their contrasting lobe shapes provide a clear and satisfying introduction to lichen identification. Learning to recognise them opens the door to understanding the broader ecology of lichens in Milton Keynes and helps build the confidence to explore the rest of the Xanthorion community.
I would like to thank Martin Ferns for proofreading the text and to Mark Powell for being such a great support throughout my lichen‑learning journey — helping me understand the terminology, introducing me to new species and reviewing my articles with his expert knowledge.
Jagoda Zajac, June 2026
References
- British Lichen Society. British Lichen Society Bulletin. Effects of hydration on the reproductive structures of Illosporiopsis christiansenii – the feasibility of a simple water-drop test in a binary field key; 2023; 132; p.15-24 BLS_Bulletin_2023_Summer.pdf
- British Lichen Society. British Lichen Society Bulletin. Cilia and rhizines in two common Physcia species; 2022; 130; p.20-26 BLS Bulletin 2022 Summer.pdf
- British Lichen Society. Physcia tenella, [Internet]. Available from: Physcia tenella
- British Lichen Society. Physcia adscendens, [Internet]. Available from: Physcia adscendens
- British Lichen Society. Lichen Ecology, [Internet]. Available from: Lichen Ecology | The British Lichen Society
- Dobson F, Lichens. An Illustrated Guide to the British and Irish Species. The British Lichen Society. 2018 p.352, 355
- Gilbert O, Lichens. The New Naturalist. HarperCollinsPublishers. 2000 p.46, 59, 166
- Whelan P, Lichens of Ireland and Great Britain. A Visual Guide to Their Identification
Volume II. Holm Oak Press; 2024. p.512, 588, 591, 835, 836, Yahr R, Stoakley J, Lichens of Great Britain and Ireland. An introductory Guide. Bloomsbury; 2025. p.180


